
One girl's thoughts on
I Dreamed a Dream.

|
As the world is well aware now, Michael Jackson has died, and Farrah Fawcett passed earlier today, and Ed McMahon earlier this week (this has been a sad week).
While surfing Twitter regarding MJ's passing, I saw a tweet by Perez Hilton saying "Shame on you Entertainment Tonight for posting that photo on your website! Shame on you!!!!" So I went to Entertainment Tonight and on their homepage is an "exclusive last photo" of Michael Jackson. Jackson is on a stretcher with an oxygen mask over his face, and the hands of a paramedic can be seen pushing him away. And I thought... where is the line? There have been a lot of disturbing images in the media this week: bloody photos of the Iran demonstrators, then the video still of slain Neda on the front page of the Wall Street Journal, and even more disturbing, the cell phone video of her shooting and death - actually watching her being shot and bleeding, and her life slipping away from her in a gruesome mess. I didn't hear much outcry on the broadcasting of those photos. The argument is made that: a) It happened across the world where family wouldn't be as keen to the broadcast (but with the Internet...?) b) The demonstrators WANTED the bloodshed to be shown to the world so everyone would know what was really going on, as a message to the world so she wouldn't die in vain. I also remember when supermodel Ruslana Korshunova allegedly threw herself out of her New York apartment window last summer, and the Fox News footage showed a tiny portion of her face on the stretcher, and people freaked out! Fox ended up issuing an apology for disrespecting Korshunova and her family, if I remember correctly. So where is the line? Admittedly, although I was disturbed by the Neda video, I felt like it wasn't gratuitous... and the footage of Korshunova seemed to be accidental... but this photo of Michael Jackson just seems downright gratuitous. "Exclusive last photo!" which seems to also yell, "Look what we got!" Bragging rights. Classy. (I know, I know... "When is the media ever classy?") I did talk about this subject with an accomplished journalist recently when I saw pictures on the WSJ regarding the demonstrations. "Are we allowed to do that?" I asked. "We are allowed... we just don't." So I ask you... where is the line? What is the difference, or is there one, between footage/photos shown of Ruslana Korshunova, Neda and this bragging-rights photo of Michael Jackson? Labels: deaths, dies, Ed McMahon, Farrah Fawcett, Michael Jackson, Neda, Ruslana Korshunova |
|
I saw a link to a speech by Rep. Thad McCotter (R-MI) on Twitter, and thought I'd re-post it here.
See more... +/- Labels: Ahmadinejad, Iran election, Mousavi, Neda, Obama, politics, world |
![]() Although the Iranian government would like to present a façade to the world that the demonstrations are peaceful, smiley-smiley events, the flooding of Twitter with videos and pictures proves otherwise. Many have died or been injured in the demonstrations that have lasted over a week now, but it is a woman known only as "Neda" whose death has struck a chord in the hearts of people around the nation and the world. "#IranElection" is still, and has been, the most popular search item and tweeted topic on Twitter, and "Neda" is now in the top 10. Not much is known about her, but according to CNN's Senior Editor of Middle East Affairs Octavia Nasr, Neda was shot by the Basij plainclothes militia. Nasr said that the Basij consist of people volunteering for the government - meaning they can basically do whatever they want... and one of them shot Neda in the heart (I searched for the CNN report that Octavia Nasr gave to anchor Don Lemon today, but it doesn't appear to be uploaded yet). Neda was with a man who is reported to be her father (in a blue and white striped polo shirt), and when she was shot, a person nearby recorded her last moments of life on his cell phone (WARNING: the content of this video is disturbing, nothing is blurred out) and uploaded it to the internet. It is suspected that she was 27 years old and was a student of philosophy. In a video shown on CNN today, Nasr reports: Her name is Neda. The facts surrounding her life and her death difficult to verify. She appears to be a young student who joined thousands of her countrymen to voice her disapproval of Iran's election results. Eyewitnesses say Basij militiamen hiding on a building rooftop shot Neda in her chest, silencing her forever.According to Nasr, Neda's name means "the divine voice, the calling." To CNN anchor Don Lemon, Bado Badiozamani, Iran Expert and Scholar, said that Neda has become the face of the movement "because she is the epitome, she's the essence of the movement, the movement for democracy, for freedom. She is the symbol, not only for democracy and freedom, but also for the women in that area of the world." Although many on Twitter have claimed to be a relative of Neda, Nasr said that most likely the claims are false, because Neda's family wants to stay quiet for their own safety at this time. However, BBC featured a blog post in Farsi in which Neda's fiance was supposedly interviewed. A blogger from the Huffington Post received an English translation of the article, and according to Neda's alleged fiance, Neda was not a protester and did not firmly stand for either Ahmadinejad or Mir Houssein Mousavi, but stood for "freedom and freedom for all." Other people are claiming that pictures of various women protesting are, or could be, Neda before she was shot - but this information has also not been verified. The demonstrations in Iran have taken a bloody, violent turn. Referencing Neda, one Twitter user quoted English musician/songwriter Peter Gabriel's lyrics, "You can blow out a candle, But you can't blow out a fire, Once the flames begin to catch, The wind will blow it higher." There was a time when I was dumbfounded by the idea of journalists standing by and taking pictures or interviewing people while someone suffered or died. How could they do that, and not step in? Is everything really about "the story," and "where it bleeds, it leads"? But the situation in Iran has opened my eyes. The Iranian government wouldn't have let stories like these escape in an effort to keep their façade up around the world. If it wasn't for civilians acting as journalists, or journalists on the premises (that were told to leave), the world wouldn't know what is really going on. No one would see the injustice, the violence, the students dying, or the young woman shot while walking down the street. Journalists can be the eyes and ears, the reporters to the world. Of course there are the issues of objectivity, etc., and that is another topic altogether. But these are my thoughts. Still, my heart is with the people of Iran and the family of Neda. As our American forefathers knew and experienced, freedom is not free. Labels: Ahmadinejad, Iran election, Mousavi, Neda, Octavia Nasr, Tehran |