weakest shade of blue.


leah
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


One girl's thoughts on music, entertainment, movies, all kinds of random things.
I Dreamed a Dream.
Add to Technorati Favorites
Add to Google
eXTReMe Tracker


misc
Follow me on Twitter.

links
Bare Budget Beauty
Celebitchy
ColinAke.com
Daniel Ian (my awesome brother)
Explosive Limes
JohnCabrera.com
just b
NathanFowler.com
PhotoShopped
prettyloud
Rebecca's Art & Play
StephenGuyHardin.com
When Tara Met Blog
Comments by Haloscan.


thanks
© * étoile filante
inspiration/colours: mintyapple
icons: cablelines
reference: x / x

archives
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
title: Ethical question: footage/photos of "last moments" or death
date: 6.25.2009
time:7:50 PM
|
As the world is well aware now, Michael Jackson has died, and Farrah Fawcett passed earlier today, and Ed McMahon earlier this week (this has been a sad week).

While surfing Twitter regarding MJ's passing, I saw a tweet by Perez Hilton saying "Shame on you Entertainment Tonight for posting that photo on your website! Shame on you!!!!" So I went to Entertainment Tonight and on their homepage is an "exclusive last photo" of Michael Jackson. Jackson is on a stretcher with an oxygen mask over his face, and the hands of a paramedic can be seen pushing him away. And I thought... where is the line?

There have been a lot of disturbing images in the media this week: bloody photos of the Iran demonstrators, then the video still of slain Neda on the front page of the Wall Street Journal, and even more disturbing, the cell phone video of her shooting and death - actually watching her being shot and bleeding, and her life slipping away from her in a gruesome mess. I didn't hear much outcry on the broadcasting of those photos. The argument is made that:
a) It happened across the world where family wouldn't be as keen to the broadcast (but with the Internet...?)
b) The demonstrators WANTED the bloodshed to be shown to the world so everyone would know what was really going on, as a message to the world so she wouldn't die in vain.

I also remember when supermodel Ruslana Korshunova allegedly threw herself out of her New York apartment window last summer, and the Fox News footage showed a tiny portion of her face on the stretcher, and people freaked out! Fox ended up issuing an apology for disrespecting Korshunova and her family, if I remember correctly.

So where is the line? Admittedly, although I was disturbed by the Neda video, I felt like it wasn't gratuitous... and the footage of Korshunova seemed to be accidental... but this photo of Michael Jackson just seems downright gratuitous. "Exclusive last photo!" which seems to also yell, "Look what we got!" Bragging rights. Classy.

(I know, I know... "When is the media ever classy?")

I did talk about this subject with an accomplished journalist recently when I saw pictures on the WSJ regarding the demonstrations. "Are we allowed to do that?" I asked.
"We are allowed... we just don't."

So I ask you... where is the line? What is the difference, or is there one, between footage/photos shown of Ruslana Korshunova, Neda and this bragging-rights photo of Michael Jackson?

Labels: , , , , , ,



title: McCotter floor speech
date:
time:2:06 PM
|
I saw a link to a speech by Rep. Thad McCotter (R-MI) on Twitter, and thought I'd re-post it here.
See more... +/-



Her name was Neda. In Farsi, it means “the voice.” True to her name, she loved music; sought freedom; and she’s dead - shot down in the streets by the Iranian regime’s state sanctioned murderers. She must not have died in vain.
Today, Iranians and Americans face a generational chance for freedom - one that ensures a rogue regime’s implosion prevents a nuclear confrontation.
Regrettably, our president’s “post-American” foreign policy presumes talk can thaw the murderous mullahs’ hearts and attain a “grand bargain” for peace in our time; consequently, while Iranians demanded their freedom from a barbarous regime, the president vapidly opined: “It is up to Iranians to make decisions about who Iran’s leaders will be… We respect Iranian sovereignty.”
Then, as the crisis escalated, the president optimistically noted:
“You’ve seen in Iran some initial reaction from the supreme leader that indicates he understands the Iranian people have deep concerns about the election… And my hope is - is that the Iranian people will make the right steps in order for them to be able to express their voices, to express their aspirations.”
Tragically, the supreme leader’s deep concern drove him to step on the throats of pro-democracy demonstrators, like Neda.
Next, on June 20th, the president stated, “The universal rights to assembly and free speech must be respected, and the United States stands with all who seek to exercise those rights.” It was painfully evident just how far behind them he stood: “The last thing that I want to do is to have the United States be a foil for those forces inside Iran who would love nothing better than to make this an argument about the United States.”
With these contradictory statements of support and appeasement, the president returned to square one: “The Iranian people will ultimately judge the actions of their own government. If the Iranian government seeks the respect of the international community, it must respect the dignity of its own people and govern through consent, not coercion.”
In truth, the Iranian people have already judged the regime and found it wonting. The supreme leader, his cleric cronies and their puppet government have never respected the dignity of the Iranian people or governed through consent. This is why the regime stole the election and shoots peaceful, pro-democracy demonstrators. Implying otherwise mocks the Iranians risking and losing their lives for liberty.
As for the claim that American “meddling” in support of the demonstrators plays into the mullahs’ hands, the Iranian regime will claim this regardless, for as our president noted, “That’s what they do.”
Yet, what matters is not what the regime says about America, but what the demonstrators think about America. Presently, brave Iranians watch as our president still holds an open hand to the regime that opened fire on them…that opened fire on Neda. This is the passive, disastrous policy of Jimmy Carter that led to the rise of this rogue regime; not the courageous policy of Ronald Reagan that led to the demise of an evil empire.
The surest, safest termination of Iran’s nuclear weapons program and support of terrorism is to hasten this fanatical tyranny’s collapse by supporting its people’s liberty. Taking its rightful place amongst the community of free nations, a democratic Iran will necessarily realize and reverse the insanity of this terrorist regime’s homicidal obsession with nuclear weapons. Thus, for their liberty and our security, the United States and the world must do everything in our power to further the Iranian demonstrators’ sacred claim to freedom. We know Neda did.
Further, in the grand strategy of our War for Freedom over terrorism, how we aid pro-democracy Iranians’ will remind the world who we are - we are Americans: the revolutionary children of freedom who have lived and died defending our liberty and extending it to the enslaved and oppressed. We will do no less today in support of our Iranian brothers and sisters.
Today, Neda’s voice calls to our consciences and warns that the fate of Iranians’ liberty is entwined with the fate of Americans’ security. We must not miss this generational chance for freedom - again one that ensures a rogue regime’s implosion prevents a nuclear confrontation; and that Neda and all liberty’s martyrs shall not have died in vain. As Americans, we must seize this moment and help Iranians seize their freedom.
That’s what we do.

Labels: , , , , , ,



title: Neda: 'the calling'
date: 6.22.2009
time:5:02 PM
|

Although the Iranian government would like to present a façade to the world that the demonstrations are peaceful, smiley-smiley events, the flooding of Twitter with videos and pictures proves otherwise. Many have died or been injured in the demonstrations that have lasted over a week now, but it is a woman known only as "Neda" whose death has struck a chord in the hearts of people around the nation and the world.

"#IranElection" is still, and has been, the most popular search item and tweeted topic on Twitter, and "Neda" is now in the top 10. Not much is known about her, but according to CNN's Senior Editor of Middle East Affairs Octavia Nasr, Neda was shot by the Basij plainclothes militia. Nasr said that the Basij consist of people volunteering for the government - meaning they can basically do whatever they want... and one of them shot Neda in the heart (I searched for the CNN report that Octavia Nasr gave to anchor Don Lemon today, but it doesn't appear to be uploaded yet). Neda was with a man who is reported to be her father (in a blue and white striped polo shirt), and when she was shot, a person nearby recorded her last moments of life on his cell phone (WARNING: the content of this video is disturbing, nothing is blurred out) and uploaded it to the internet. It is suspected that she was 27 years old and was a student of philosophy.

In a video shown on CNN today, Nasr reports:
Her name is Neda. The facts surrounding her life and her death difficult to verify. She appears to be a young student who joined thousands of her countrymen to voice her disapproval of Iran's election results. Eyewitnesses say Basij militiamen hiding on a building rooftop shot Neda in her chest, silencing her forever.

A man who appears to be her father desperately calling on her to open her eyes. A stranger begging her to stay awake. "Don't be afraid. Don't be afraid, Neda," the man says. But Neda doesn't respond. She dies right there on the streets. Another protester capturing her last moments on a cell phone camera. And just like that, Neda, who came to the square thinking she's one voice among thousands, turned into the voice of an entire opposition movement.

Neda, which means the calling, is now on millions of flips across the globe, on the Internet in especially designed avatars. A young life cut down in its prime. One woman's gripping story speaking volumes, a grim reminder of the price Iranians could pay for freedom.
According to Nasr, Neda's name means "the divine voice, the calling." To CNN anchor Don Lemon, Bado Badiozamani, Iran Expert and Scholar, said that Neda has become the face of the movement "because she is the epitome, she's the essence of the movement, the movement for democracy, for freedom. She is the symbol, not only for democracy and freedom, but also for the women in that area of the world."

Although many on Twitter have claimed to be a relative of Neda, Nasr said that most likely the claims are false, because Neda's family wants to stay quiet for their own safety at this time. However, BBC featured a blog post in Farsi in which Neda's fiance was supposedly interviewed. A blogger from the Huffington Post received an English translation of the article, and according to Neda's alleged fiance, Neda was not a protester and did not firmly stand for either Ahmadinejad or Mir Houssein Mousavi, but stood for "freedom and freedom for all."

Other people are claiming that pictures of various women protesting are, or could be, Neda before she was shot - but this information has also not been verified.

The demonstrations in Iran have taken a bloody, violent turn. Referencing Neda, one Twitter user quoted English musician/songwriter Peter Gabriel's lyrics, "You can blow out a candle, But you can't blow out a fire, Once the flames begin to catch, The wind will blow it higher."

There was a time when I was dumbfounded by the idea of journalists standing by and taking pictures or interviewing people while someone suffered or died. How could they do that, and not step in? Is everything really about "the story," and "where it bleeds, it leads"? But the situation in Iran has opened my eyes. The Iranian government wouldn't have let stories like these escape in an effort to keep their façade up around the world. If it wasn't for civilians acting as journalists, or journalists on the premises (that were told to leave), the world wouldn't know what is really going on. No one would see the injustice, the violence, the students dying, or the young woman shot while walking down the street. Journalists can be the eyes and ears, the reporters to the world. Of course there are the issues of objectivity, etc., and that is another topic altogether. But these are my thoughts.

Still, my heart is with the people of Iran and the family of Neda. As our American forefathers knew and experienced, freedom is not free.

Labels: , , , , ,